Fossil Evidence Against Evolution Increases

www.stonexp.com  2010-08-14 11:50:55  Popularity Index:0  Source:Internet

The fossil evidence against evolution has increased immensely over the last few decades. This fact has become more evident over the last number of months.

It is no secret that many of the top evolutionists have admitted that the intermediate fossils are missing to support the theory of evolution. These fossils are the so called in between fossils that show the creatures that are between one kind of creature and the new kind of creature it was supposed to have evolved into.

These fossils are simply missing.

By now there should have been literally millions of these discovered by now.

There were a few of these in the past. They have all vanished.

The duck-billed platypus was supposed to have been one of these links in the past. It had a number of traits that were similar to other creatures. There is no indication anymore that it is an intermediate form to anything else.

The archaeopteryx was also an "in-between" form. This was an extinct bird with claws on its wings. It was supposed to be a link between reptiles and birds. Evolutionists admit that it is no longer considered to lead to any other form of life.

Some evolutionists still believe in whale evolution from a cow like creature. That has been ruled out because of the lack of evolutionary time and the fact that one of these so called in-between forms ended up being a hoax (a scientist added parts to one of the pictures as though it were real). What is left of the so-called whale evolution is just fragments of fossils that cannot be tied to one another (It is not verifiable in any way).

Some of the more notable evolution scientists have now admitted that the fossil record does not give us any verifiable intermediate fossils. Stephen J. Gould admitted this many years ago. He helped establish the idea of the punctuated equilibrium theory.

This theory simply says that evolution happened in gigantic steps (this would be the exact same results that special creationists have proclaimed for decades).

Richard Dawkins has taken the theory in a different direction. He says that life came from the seed of aliens. That idea simply puts off the inevitable; where did that life come from.

Oxford zoologist described the real problems that evolutionists have with the fossil record, "In any case, no real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuationist, uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of the theory of evolution as opposed to special creation."

There is not even one fossil that can be verified to be an intermediate form. There should be millions by now... if evolution were true.

Charles Darwin admitted that there were no intermediate fossils to support his theory. But he was counting on the fact that there would be some day. He also admitted that if none were found, his theory was no good.

Every year there seems to be an increase in the fossil record against evolution. But it gets even worse for those that believe in the theory.

Today, without the fossils to support his theory, by his own admission, Charles Darwin would be forced to deny his own theory.